domingo, 30 de marzo de 2014

L'ORÉAL | Piktochart Infographic Editor

Click on the image to enlarge it!

https://magic.piktochart.com/output/1603355-loreal#.UzhBtlJ__jw.blogger

domingo, 16 de marzo de 2014

CONTROL

Types of controls used by  L'oréal

L'oreal Markets

Maturity Markets:  West Europe, North America.
  • Maturity markets grow up less than the new markets. These are produce by GDP of West Europe and North America growth up lower than the GDP.
  • They are leaders in this to market, where they take the 35.6% Western Europe 25.0% North America of the total market.
  • Strategy of the Maturity market is to maintain and be the leader using the innovation being in front of their competitors in this markets.

New Markets: East Europe, South America, Africa, Asia and Oceania.
  • Markets of opportunities to grow up , which  there are a lot of population in cooperation with the  maturity market  that is means more necessity  to sells products. (Grow ass a company)
  • The GDP of this market Sells (IS GETTING BIGGER)

Asia and Oceania   34%

Latin America 12%

East Europe 7%

Africa 4%

Standards of L'oreal:

-Haircare

-Perfumes

-Cosmetics 

-Makeup 

Negative aspects of L'oréal control
It’s a really huge company that is the leader of the markets in the world. The problem is that when you are the leader  you have to maintain the most of sells that you did before at the markets that you control the most  because  you can not grow in the mature market.

Corrective action of L'oréal
L'oréal stop to try their product with animals.

Control process create by L'oréal
L’Oréal created a Worldwide Diversity section and from 2007 onwards coordinators were selected to the group’s twigs. Today, this network of around 30 people is composed of HR managers.

The most countries that L'oréal sells their products. They have a different types of managers in each country that works as a totally different company between them. Because in a difference countries there are a difference needs, but they have the top managers in Paris where they rule the hold company.

L'oreal awards
They get a difference awards in the differences brands that they have. shampo more sell of the year, product chose by the costumers... etc

MOTIVATION, LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNICATION



COMMUNICATION is defined as the activity of conveying information throught the exchange of thoughts, messages , or information, as by speeches, writing or behavior.
As we are going to see, L`oreal is a perfect example of communication, because they do not meet with the definition meet above, they also go along.

L´oreal has created "L`oreal & Me " and it provides greater clarity on policies and processes, strengthens dialogue between managers and employees, and boosts employee involvement in decisions concerning their career and development. The programme embodies L’Oréal’s ambition to build a lasting mutual commitment between the company and all its employees.

For the LEADERSHIP part, they have been archived numerous awards as The International Top 20 for Leader Development and is also recognized by the World Diversity Leadership Council.

The International Top 20 for Leader Develpment is an award  recognition of the company’s excellence in creating a robust and sustainable pipeline of leaders. The organizer of the study, Aon Hewitt, states that the top companies have “an intense focus on talent, and they are deliberate about hiring, coaching, developing and rewarding success. Their leadership programs are practical, relevant and aligned with business goals.” L’Oréal was recognized for its unique capacity to internally develop its own leaders, making long term commitments with unique individuals that will build the company in the future.
For the other hand, L’Oréal was recognized by the World Diversity Leadership Council for its diversity initiatives and in particular for its innovative products launched by its brands. This is the first time that L’Oréal received an international recognition for the cultural diversity of its products.
L`Oreal was one of the four companies honored for innovation in devrisity management during the World Diversity Leadership Summit, held in Prague in 2006. L`Oreal was selected by a peer jury of corporate diversity executives.They recognized its ability to offer products adapted to the needs of consumers around the world.This forum was attended by 200 senior corporate, government and non-governmental organization officitals from around the world.

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

1.  Division of labor.

To ensure its development, L’Oréal divides their labour into global Research and Innovation centres, a unique portfolio of brands organized by distribution channel and geographical zone, and an integrated industrial production.

2. Departmentalization. 


L´Oréal has a very clear range of departments. The most outstanding ones are:

  • Product departmentalization: groups jobs by product line. L’Oréal has a portfolio of international brands that cover all the lines of cosmetics: hair care, coloring, skin care, make-up and perfume. Very complementary, these brands are managed within the group by divisions that each have expertise in their own distribution channel, which would be an example of cross functional teams. This organization is one of L’Oréal's major strengths. But, let´s see this variety of brands! Probably you will find a lot that you didn´t think they belonged to L´Oréal.
  • Georaphical departmentalization: In this field L´Oréal is very well organized, from the top managers to factories. As we saw on the introduction the boards comittee is formed by managers of different geographical zones in whcih L´Oréal is located. In addition, in the field of innovation and research, which is strategically spreaded in different countries, with very specialized employees (another example of cross-functional teams divided into the disciplines of: biology, chemistry, physics, optics, microbiology, statistical analysis , bioinformatics, ethnology, sociology, dermatology: functional departmentalization), we can also find a wide division.   

    Let´s see some pictures!:

  • Customer departmentalization: One of the ambitions of L´Oréal is to make customised products for all the diverse customers that we find worldwide depending on the country they live, the lifestyle ...They think the diversity of the teams is one of the success factors. Fostering the values of all forms of multiculturalism and respect for differences, the group is enriched by employees from various horizons that enable it to gain a better understanding of the diversity of its consumers and markets.  The huge variety of brands we saw   and its products is a testimony to its commitment to enhance every type of beauty.

Do you want to know more?

The chain of command in L´Oréal is the continuous line of authority that extends from upper organizational levels ( comittee and borad of directors) to the lowest levels ( interns) and clarifies who reports to whom. For instance, inside the upper levels, the board of directors make the decisions whcih are audited by the comitee and then the one who makes the final decision is the CEO.

So we could say that  authority, which refers to the rights inherent in a managerial position to tell people what to do and to expect them to do it, is practised by those upper levels of L´Oréal. This really, facilitates decision making and coordination, .This managers coordinate and integrate the work of employees, but we can also make a division in here because as L´Oréal is a huge company, it is worlwide, so it divides the authority into the georaphic zones having one manager for each one of them that makes decisions regarding their zone. And inside the georaphic zone we find different divisions of labour such the ones we saw in the map. Depending on which ones are present in each of the zones there would be different submanagers and coordinators with different specialised employees. Those employees assume an obligation to perform any assigned duties regarding their fild of expertise. 

This obligation or expectation to perform is known as responsibility. In addition, L´Oréal also include different areas in each of their companies  which are coordinated by managers of that area and in wich we can find lots of young people that interact with different levels of authority including themselves. Those are: Digital; Human Resources; Communication ; Business Development; Sales and Retail; Marketing; Legal; Information systems and technology; Finance; Operations and Research and Innovation.

However, employees throughout the organization can access information that used to be available only to top managers in a matter of a few seconds. Because for L´Oreal si very important to take into account their points of view. That´s why they have jobs such as junior marketing manager, whcih is aimed to young poeple and enables them to participate in the decision making toghether with upper levels. so we could conlude that authority is not extreme but shared.

Make it visual with the span of control!!

Let´s see some examples!!
  • L'Oréal's Board of Directors, met on Monday, February 10th, 2014, to authorize the acquisition by L'Oréal from Nestlé of a block of 48,500,000 L'Oréal shares, representing 8% of its share capital. This acquisition, which was announced in a press release on Tuesday, February 11th, 2014, was conditioned upon the sale to Nestlé of L'Oréal's holding in Galderma. This sale was authorized by L'Oréal's Board of Directors, held on Thursday, March 20th, 2014, after the employee representative bodies of the relevant companies concerned have issued their opinion. On Friday, March 21st, 2014, L'Oréal and Nestlé signed the share purchase agreement; the completion of the sale is conditional upon the approval of the sale by the competition authorities.
  • Initial studies carried out by the Group in the late 1980s identified the physical and biological characteristics of African hair that explain its great fragility. To build on this knowledge, the Group opened “The L’Oréal Institute for Ethnic Hair and Skin Research” in the United States in 2003, the first centre entirely dedicated to studying ethnic skin and hair. Additionally, a centre in South Africa enables the group to evaluate formulas for the specific needs of consumers in the region.
    This expertise allows L’Oréal to offer tailor-made products that are adapted to different lifestyles, habits and levels of purchasing power. In this example we can see how the upper level is receiving the feedback from the lower levels of research to make the decision , so power is concentrated in the lower level. In this case the one who reports information to the upper level is
    Geoff Skingsley, Executive Vice President for Africa and the Middle East.

Centralization and decentralization in L´Oréal:


Taking this table into account, we can realize that altough there is clear upper level management and L´oréal is a very huge company there is centralization when taking most important decisions. However , all those decisions are based on analysing all the levels below: their stidies, expertise opinion and decisions. so we can also say that it is decentralized. In fact, the table shows more point for this one.


 

Evolution of the organizational structure:
In the begining L ´Oréal was characterized by an organic structure because it was bassically Eugene schuller and its laboratory, so there was quite flexibility. Then it started to grow with more scientists till 1956 . In this period L ´Oréal was constructing its model but after this we welcome the expansion of L ´Oréal. consequently, there started to be high specialization, rigid departmentalization, narrow spans of control, high formalization. For instance, in 1964 they bought Lancome. nad in the end, they are nowadays the first in the beauty industry with a lot of brands worldwide. Hence, it presents a mechanistic organization.

Let´s see an example focused on the brands divisions:
Bureaucracy or  adhocracy?
Large French companies, such as L´Oréal bear the weight of this entrepreneurial "counter-culture", (entrepreneriual spirit comes from family and is hard to start up), a phenomenon that is amplified by the size factor and its natural corollary: bureaucratisation. The larger companies grow, the larger their volume of trade, the more structured and rigid their rules and operating modes will become: this means more control and formal coordination mechanisms, which is very visible in L´Oréal.